MEDIA AND CULTURE: Frame analysis for the reception study

Authors

Keywords:

Reception studies, audience analysis, framing research, agenda setting, sociocultural research, media analysis

Abstract

The frames are organizational structures, cognitive operations, as that the narrative matrices resorted by media genres, these are part the substrate of the culture that transmitters and receptors share. “Framing studies” or “framing theory” are closely linked to political issues. Studies of the “framing effect” are inscribed in the tradition of the theory of the effects, but pretend configure a differentiated model over other models, especially the agenda setting and priming.

The article argues that the notion of Frame analysis finds its foundations in the sociology of Erving Goffman who, beyond Bateson, develops the cinematic metaphor applied to everyday life. It indicates that the framing research is interrogated by the way how issues and discourses are constructed as well as the meanings that unfold there. These studies complicate the text-audience relationship, because it takes into account the interaction with the memory of the audience or its possibility of resistance readings. These studies provide a productive articulation, both theoretical and methodological, with reception studies and their development from cultural studies.

Article Metrics

|Abstract: 542 | PDF (Español (España)): 252 |

Author Biography

Rosario Sánchez Vilela, Universidad Católica del Uruguay

Dra. Rosario Sánchez Vilela. Docente e investigadora del Departamento de Comunicación, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas de la Universidad Católica del Uruguay. Directora del Programa de Investigación de Medios de Comunicación y Cultura y de la Maestría en Comunicación. Énfasis en recepción y cultura de la misma institución. Es Master en Comunicación Social (UCU) y Doctora en Ciencia Política (UDELAR). Integra el Sistema Nacional de Investigadores del Uruguay.

References

Andacht,F. “Los marcos del mundo”, http://www.raco.cat/index.php/Dart/article/

viewFile/100252/150941, consultado el 11 de febrero de 2011.

Arendt, H. (1993) La condición humana,Barcelona, Paidós.

Arendt, H. (1997) ¿Qué es la política?, Barcelona, Paidós.

Charadeau, P. (2003), El discurso de la información. La construcción del espejo social, Barcelona, Gedisa.

Chihu Amparán, Aquiles (2006), “El “análisis de los marcos” en el discurso de Bush (septiembre 11 de 2001)”, Revista

Comunicación y Sociedad, Nueva época, Nro. 6, Departamento de Comunicación Social Universidad de Guadalajara, México.

Chong, D. / Druckman, J. N. “Dynamic Public Opinion: framing effects over time”. http://www.mendeley.com/research/dynamic-publicopinion-framing-effects-time/

Dahlgren, Peter, (1996) Television and the public sphere: citizenship, democracy and the media, California, Sage.

Dahlgren, Peter, (2002), “The public sphere an historical narrativa”, en McQuail, Denis, Mc Quail’s reader in mass communication Theory,Sage.

Dahlgren, Peter, Sparks, Colin, (1997). Communication and citizenship: journalism and the public sphere, New York, Routledge.

Dayan, Daniel (comp.) 1997 En busca del público, Barcelona, Gedisa.

Elster. Jon, (comp.) (2001), La democracia deliberativa, Barcelona, Gedisa.

Entman, R. (2004), Projections of power. Framing news, public opinion and U. S. foreing policy, The University of Chicago Press, USA.

Entman, R.,(1993) “Framing: toward clarification

of a fractured paradigm” Journal of Communication,

(4).

Ferree, M. M, Gamson, W. A., Gerhards, J., Rucht, D. (2002), Schapin abortion discours. Democracy and public sphera in Germany and United States, N.Y., Cambridge University Press.

Ferry, Jean-Marc (1998) “La transformación de la publicidad política”, en Ferry, Wolton y otros, El nuevo espacio público, Barcelona, Gedisa.

Published

2015-03-02

How to Cite

Vilela, R. S. (2015). MEDIA AND CULTURE: Frame analysis for the reception study. Luciérnaga Comunicación, 5(10), 41–54. Retrieved from https://revistas.elpoli.edu.co/index.php/luc/article/view/309

Issue

Section

Articles