Transferência de tecnologia 4.0 nos ecossistemas de inovação da América Latina
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33571/teuken.v11n17a10Palavras-chave:
transferência de tecnología, ecossistema de inovação, tecnologia 4.0, reestruturação produtiva dos setores locaisResumo
Este artigo analisou os processos de transferência de tecnologia 4.0, suas condições e as principais tendências tecnológicas transferíveis da América Latina. A abordagem de complexidade no ecossistema permitiu explicar como os atores ou subsistemas são (re)adaptados ou (re)aprendidos com base em sua interação sem serem gerenciados por nenhuma entidade ou componente específico. O processo metodológico consistiu em uma análise cientométrica, uma análise temática com base nos projetos financiados com recursos públicos de 2002 a 2018 e uma análise do ecossistema de inovação na região emergente do Bajío mexicano. Os resultados mostraram a relevância de organismos intermediários na liderança social para transferência de tecnologia; big data, IoT y cloud computing são as principais tecnologias 4.0 que são potencialmente transferíveis para responder a condições territoriais heterogêneas.Métricas do artigo
Resumo: 624 PDF (English): 370Métricas PlumX
Referências
Álvarez, L. & Palacios, R. (2018). Towards a strategic reorganization of the innovation ecosystem in the Latin American university. Conference paper 17th International Schumpeter Society Conference on Innovation, Catch-up, and sustainable development. Seoul National University.
Álvarez, L.; Estrada, S. & Palacios, R. (2018). El sistema de innovación ante el reto del desarrollo en la región del Bajío mejicano (59-84). En: Álvarez, L. y De la Rosa, M. Veredas del desarrollo regional sostenible. Ciudad de Méjico: Plaza y Valdés.
Ankrah, S. & Al-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31 (3), 387-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003
Arenal, A.; Armuña, C.; Feijoo, C.; Ramos, S.; XU, Z. & Moreno, A. (2020). Innovation ecosystems theory revisited: The case of artificial intelligence in China. Telecommunications Policy, 44 (6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101960
Beier, G.; Ullrich, A.; Niehoff, S.; Reißig, M. & Habich, M. (2020). Industry 4.0: How it is defined from a sociotechnical perspective and how much sustainability it includes – – A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120856
Casas, R. (2020). Políticas públicas de ciencia y tecnología en América Latina. Ante la encrucijada de los cambios políticos. Teuken Bidikay, 11 (16), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.33571/teuken.v11n16a1
Chang, Y.; Yang, P. & Chen, M. (2009). The determinants of academic research commercial performance: Towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective. Research Policy, 38 (6), 936-946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.03.005
Chesbrough, H. (2017). The Future of Open Innovation. Research-Technology Management, 60 (1). 35-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2017.1255054
Clifford, G. (2003). Interpretación de las culturas. Gedisa Edit. 387 pp.
Coscieme, L.; Silva, H.; Fernández-Llamazares, A.; Palomo, I.; Mwampamba. T.H.; Selomane, O… & Valle, M. (2020). Multiple conceptualizations of nature are key to inclusivity and legitimacy in global environmental governance. Environmental Science & Policy, 104, 36-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.018
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32, 109–121.
Etzkowitz, H. (2018). Innovation Governance: From the “Endless Frontier” to the Triple Helix (291-311). In: Meusburger et al. Geographies of the University. Knowledge and Space. Springer.
Fayomi, O.; Akande, I.; Esse, U. & Fayomi, G. (2019). Winning research through ideal research laboratory. Procedia Manufacturing, 35, 1228-1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.080
Fukuda, K. (2020). Science, technology and innovation ecosystem transformation toward society 5.0. International Journal of Production Economics, 220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.033
Giraldo, M. E. (2019). Políticas Regionales de Ciencia y Tecnología. Capacidades interactivas, redes y desarrollo territorial en dos parques tecnocientíficos de Méjico y Colombia. Centro de Investigaciones sobre América Latina y el Caribe (CIALC), UNAM. 420 pp.
González, J. & Álvarez, L. (2019). Open innovation joined to knowledge management in Latin American public universities. Comparative case. Espacios, 40 (15), 17-28. http://www.revistaespacios.com/a19v40n15/a19v40n15p17.pdf
Hasanefendic, S.; Heitor, M. & Horta, H. (2016). Training students for new jobs: The role of technical and vocational higher education and implications for science policy in Portugal. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 113 (Part B), 328-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.005
Hermann, M., Pentek, T. & Otto, B. (2016). Design principles for industrie 4.0 scenarios. Conference paper Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii: IEEE.
Hou, B., Hong, J.; Wang, H. & Zhou, C. (2018). Academia-industry collaboration, government funding and innovation efficiency in Chinese industrial enterprises. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31 (6, 692-706 https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1543868
IBD & WEF (2019). Supply Chain 4.0, Global Practices and Lessons Learned for Latin America and the Caribbean. https://www.weforum.org/whitepapers/supply-chain-4-0-global-practices-and-lessons-learned-for-latin-america-and-the-caribbean-c4ffe6b1-b2f0-44f1-8b1d-c740cc11ca6f
Ivanov, D. (2020). Predicting the impacts of epidemic outbreaks on global supply chains: A simulation-based analysis on the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) case. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.101922
Janse, N.; Telukdarie, A. & Dhamija, P. (2019). Society 4.0 applied in Africa: Advancing the social impact of technology. Technology in Society, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.04.001
Jacobides, M. G. Cennamo, C. & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39 (8). 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
Järvi, K.; Almpanopoulou, A. & Ritala, P. (2018). Organization of knowledge ecosystems: Prefigurative and partial forms. Research Policy, 47 (8), 1523-1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.05.007
Jenson, I.; Leith, P.; Doyle, R.; West, J. & Miles, M. (2016). Testing innovation systems theory using Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Journal of Business Research, 69 (4), 1283-1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.093
Kim, Y.; Rheeb, M. & Kotha, R. (2019). Many hands: the effect of the prior inventor-intermediaries relationship on academic license. Research Policy, 48 (3), 813-819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.11.007
Leahey, E. & Barringer, S. (2020). Universities’ commitment to interdisciplinary research: To what end? Research Policy, 49 (2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103910
Méjico. CONACYT (2018a). Programa de Estímulos a la innovación. https://www.conacyt.gob.mx/index.php/el-conacyt/convocatorias-y-resultados-conacyt/convocatorias-programa-de-estimulos-a-la-innovacion
Méjico. CONACYT (2018b). Fondos Mixtos constituidos. https://www.conacyt.gob.mx/index.php/fondos-y-apoyos/fondos-mixtos
Méjico. CONACYT (2018c). Fondo de Innovación tecnológica SE-CONACYT. https://www.conacyt.gob.mx/index.php/el-conacyt/convocatorias-y-resultados-conacyt/convocatorias-fondos-sectoriales-constituidos/convocatoria-se-conacyt-innovacion-tecnologica
Méjico. GPI (2019). Guanajuato Puerto Interior: Smart port 4.0. http://puertointerior.com.mx
Méjico. Novaera (2019). Ecosistema de innovación y emprendimiento del estado de Guanajuato. https://novaera.com.mx
Milesi, D.; Verre, V. & Petelski, N. (2017). Science-industry R&D cooperation effects on firm’s appropriation strategy: The case of Argentine biopharma. European Journal of Innovation Management, 20 (3), 372-391. https://doi.org/10.24275/etypuam/ne/472017/verre
OECD (2019). Shaping the Digital Transformation in Latin America: Strengthening Productivity, Improving Lives. OECD Publishing. 102 pp.
Pérez, M. (2015). Ambientes innovadores en Méjico. Revista de Geografía Norte Grande, 62, 203-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34022015000300012
Perkmann, M.; Tartari, V.; Mckelvey, M.; Autio, E.; Brostom, A.; D´Este, P... & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42 (2), 423-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
Phillips, M. & Ritala, P. (2019). A complex adaptive systems agenda for ecosystem research methodology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 148, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119739
Russell, M. & Smorodinskaya, N. (2018). Leveraging complexity for ecosystemic innovation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 136, 114–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.024
Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum.
Shi, X.; Wu, Y. & Fu, D. (2019). Does University-Industry collaboration improve innovation efficiency? Evidence from Chinese Firms. Economic Modelling, 86, 39-53.
Show, R.; Kim, Y. & Hua, J. (2020). Governance, technology and citizen behavior in pandemic: Lessons from COVID-19 in East Asia. Progress in Disaster Science, 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100090
Soares, T.J. Torkomian, A.L.V. & Seido, M. (2020). University regulations, regional development and technology transfer: The case of Brazil. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120129
Thuemmler, C. & Bai, C. (2017). Health 4.0: How virtualization and big data are revolutionizing healthcare. Springer. 254 pp.
Villani, E.; Rasmussen, E. & Grimaldi, R. (2017). How intermediary organisations facilitate university–industry technology transfer: A proximity approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 86-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.004
WEF (2018). Latin America at a Turning Point: Shaping the New Narrative. World Economic Forum. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/LA18_Report.pdf
WEF (2020). 2030: from technology optimism to technology realism. Insight Report. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/01/decade-of-action-from-technology-optimism-to-technology-realism/
Yao, C.; Huan, C. & Su, J. (2020). A bibliometrics-based research framework for exploring policy evolution: A case study of China's information technology policies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120116
Yin, R. (2003). Case study research. Design and methods. 3a. ed. Thousand Oaks. 182 pp.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2020 Lorena del Carmen Álvarez-Castañón
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
