History of Scientific Journals

Shawn J. Martin

doi:10.33571/revistaluciernaga.v11n22a1

Autores/as

Shawn J. Martin Biblioteca Dartmouth https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9128-5528

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33571/revistaluciernaga.v11n22a1

Palabras clave:

Royal Society, historia, revistas, ciencia, publicaciones, comunicación académica, historia de la ciencia, análisis textual.

Resumen

Los académicos que investigan la historia de las revistas provienen de múltiples disciplinas y perspectivas; al igual que aquellos que han escrito sobre la historia de las profesiones y la educación superior. Principalmente los campos que investigan la historia de las revistas son: la historia de la ciencia, la historia del libro, las comunicaciones y los estudios de información. Los académicos de todos estos campos probablemente estarían de acuerdo en que el artículo de investigación es un artefacto importante que se produce a partir de las tendencias sociales más grandes de profesionalización y burocratización de las universidades. Los artículos de investigación se convirtieron en un género de escritura exclusivo para científicos profesionales. A pesar de la importancia del artículo de investigación en tantos campos diferentes de investigación científica, pocos académicos han investigado sus orígenes.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33571/revistaluciernaga.v11n22a1

Métricas de artículo

Resumen: 1213 PDF (English): 281 PDF: 340 HTML: 2475

Métricas PlumX

Biografía del autor/a

Shawn J. Martin, Biblioteca Dartmouth

Jefe de Comunicación Académica, Copyright y Publicación de la Biblioteca Dartmouth, Hanovre.

Citas

“Mapping the Republic of Letters,” Homepage, last modified 2013, http:// republicofletters.stanford.edu/.

David A. Kronick, “The commerce of letters: Networks and ‘Invisible Colleges’ in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Europe.” Library Quarterly, 71, No. 1 (2001), 28 – 43.

Manuel Castells, The Rise of the Network Society. (Chichester: Wiley, 2010), 440-459.

Janet Browne, “Corresponding naturalists.” In The Age of Scientific Naturalism: Tyndall and His Contemporaries, edited by Bernard Lightman and Michael S. Reidy, 157–69. London: Pickering & Chatto, 2014.

Robert Iliffe, “Making correspondents network: Henry Oldenburg, philosophical commerce, and Italian science, 1660–72.” In The Accademia del Cimento and Its European Context, edited by Marco Beretta, Antonio Clericuzio, and Lawrence M. Principe, 211–28, Sagamore Beach, MA: Science History Publications, 2009.

David A. Kronick, A History of Scientific and Technical Periodicals: The Origins and Development of the Scientific Press, 1665-1790. (Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press, 1976).

Alan G. Gross., Joseph E. Harmon, and Michael Reidy. Communicating Science: The Scientific Article from the 17th Century to the Present. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).

Adrian Johns,” Miscellaneous Methods: Authors, Societies, and Journals in Early Modern England,” The British Journal for the History of Science, 33 (2000): 166.

Mario Biagoli, “From Book Censorship to Academic Peer Review,” Emergences, 12 (2002): 23.

Ellen Valle, “Reporting the Doings of the Curious: Authors and Editors in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London,” in News Discourse in Early Modern Britain: Selected Papers of CHINED 2004, edited by Nicholas Brownlee (Bern, Switzerland: AG International Academic Publishers, 2006), 88-89.

Robert Iliffe, “Author-mongering: The ‘Editor’ Between Producer and Consumer” in The Consumption of Culture, 1600-1800: Image, Object, Text, edited by Ann Bermingham and John Brewer, (London: Routledge, 1995), 178.

Noah Moxham, “Fit for Print: Developing an Institutional Model of Scientific Periodical Publishing in England, 1665-CA. 1714,” Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 69 (2015): 250.

Ellen Valle, “Reporting the Doings of the Curious,” 75.

David Kronick, “Authorship and Authority in the Scientific Periodicals of the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century,”257.

Mario Biagioli, “Etiquette, Interdependence, and Sociability,” 220.

Ellen Valle, “Reporting the Doings of the Curious,”73.

David Kronick, “Authorship and Authority in the Scientific Periodicals,” 256.

Mario Biagioli, “Etiquette, Interdependence, and Sociability,” 226.

David Kronick, “Authorship and Authority in the Scientific Periodicals,” 270.

Ibid, 257-263.

Mario Biagioli, “Etiquette, Interdependence, and Sociability,” 210.

Lorraine Daston, “Super-Vision: Weather Watching and Table Reading in the Early Modern Royal Society and Académie Royale des Sciences,” Huntington Library Quarterly, 78 (2015): 214-215.

Noah Moxham, “Fit for Print,” 248.

Mario Biagoli, “From Book Censorship to Academic Peer Review,” 30.

Noah Moxham, “Fit for Print,” 253.

Ibid, 255.

Aileen Fyfe, “Journals, Learned Societies and Money: Philosophical Transactions, CA. 1750-1900,” Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 69 (2015): 278.

David Cahan, “Institutions and Communities” In From Natural Philosophy to the Science: Writing the History of Nineteenth-Century Science, edited by David Cahan, 291-328. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003), 291.

Alan G. Gross, Joseph E., Harmon, and Michael Reidy. Communicating Science, 159-160.

Rom Harré, “New Tools for the Philosophy of Chemistry,” 89.

Charles Bazerman, Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science, (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988).

Alan Cook, “Academic Publications before 1940,” In A Century of Science Publishing, edited by Einar H. Fredriksson,15-24. (Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press, 2001), 18-19.

Alex Csiszar, “Seriality and the search for order: Scientific print and its problems in the nineteenth century,” History of Science, 48, no. 3/4, (2010): 426.

Alex Csiszar, “Objectivities in Print,” In Objectivity in Science: New Perspectives from Science and Technology Studies, edited by Flavia Padovani, Alan Richardson, and Jonathan Tsou, 145-172. (New York, NY: Springer, 2015), 145.

Alex Csiszar, “Objectivities in Print,” In Objectivity in Science: New Perspectives from Science and Technology Studies, edited by Flavia Padovani, Alan Richardson, and Jonathan Tsou, 145-172. (New York, NY: Springer, 2015), 165

Alex Csiszar, The Scientific Journal: Authorship and the Politics of Knowledge in the Nineteenth Century. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018), 8.

Melinda Baldwin, Making Nature: The History of a Scientific Journal. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015), 21.

Ibid, 63-67.

Simon Baatz, “Squinting at Silliman: Scientific periodicals in the early American republic, 1810-1833.” Isis, 82, no. 2 (1991): 223.

Ibid, 235.

Simon Baatz, “Squinting at Silliman,” 235.

Luciana Duranti. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science. (Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 1998), 133.

Fiorella Foscarini. “Diplomatics and Genre Theory as Complementary Approaches,” Archival Science, 12 (2012): 401.

Ibid, 403.

Pamela Long, Artisan/Practitioners and the Rise of the New Sciences, 14001600. (Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press, 2011) and Pamela Long, Openness, Secrecy, Authorship: Technical Arts and the Culture of Knowledge from Antiquity to the Renaissance. (Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001).

William Eamon, Science and the Secrets of Nature: Books of Secrets in Medieval and Early Modern Cuure. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994), 320.

Ibid, 323 [48] Ibid, 331.

Steven Shapin, A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth Century England. (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1994), 64.

Thomas Sprat, The History of the Royal Society of London for the Improving of Natural Knowledge. London: Printed by T. R. for J. Martyn and J. Allestry, 1667.

William Eamon, Science and the Secrets of Nature: Books of Secrets in Medieval and Early Modern Culture. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994), 319-320.

Michael Hunter, Establishing the New Science: The Experience of the Early Royal Society. (Woodbridge: The Boydell Press, 1989), 57-58.

Ibid, 79.

Ibid.

Michael Hunter, Science and the Shape of Orthodoxy: Intellectual Change in Seventeenth Century Britain. (Woodbridge: The Boydell Press, 1995), 14-16.

Henry Oldenburg, “Epistle Dedicatory,” Philosophical Transactions, 9 (1674).

Elizabeth Tebeaux, The Emergence of a Tradition: Technical Writing in the English Renaissance, 1475 – 1640. (Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing Company, 1997), 157 [58] Ibid, 158.

Steven Shapin, A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth Century England. (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1994), 407.

George Frick, “The Royal Society in America,” in The Pursuit of Knowledge in the Early American Republic: American Scientific and Learned Societies from Colonial Times to the Civil War, edited by Alexandra Oleson, and Sanborn C Brown. (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976), 70 – 71.

American Philosophical Society. Transactions of the American

Philosophical Society. (Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1769), i – ii.

Patsy Gerstner, “The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia,” in The Pursuit of Knowledge in the Early American Republic: American Scientific and Learned Societies from Colonial Times to the Civil War, edited by Alexandra Oleson, and Sanborn C Brown. (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976), 174.

Sally Gregory Kohlstedt, The Formation of the American Scientific Community: The American Association for the Advancement of Science 18481860. (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1976), 8-9.

Bruce Sinclair, Philadelphia’s Philosopher Mechanics: A History of the Franklin Institute, 1824-1865, (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press,): 105106.

Sally Gregory Kohlstedt, The Formation of the American Scientific Community: The American Association for the Advancement of Science 18481860. (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1976), 62-63.

Jack Morrell and Arnold Thackray, Gentlemen of Science: Early Years of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981), 54-58