Gestão do conhecimento na universidade co-financiada do Equador (UCE)
Autores
-
Gabriela Cuadrado Barreto
Universidad Politécnica Estatal del Carchi
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8562-7843
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33571/teuken.v11n17a6Palavras-chave:
avaliação universitária, gestão do conhecimento, capital intelectual, ensino superiorResumo
A universidade realiza as funções de ensino, pesquisa e ligação com o meio ambiente, por isso o processo de avaliação institucional da gestão do conhecimento e do capital intelectual é essencial para entender as atividades que ela implementa. A pesquisa é quantitativa, transeccional, correlacional e não-experimental. O contexto de teste é a Universidade Co-Fundada do Equador (UCE), que responde à questão de como estudar os processos de gestão do conhecimento realizados pela universidade e se propõe a demonstrar a utilidade do Modelo de Avaliação da Gestão do Conhecimento Universitário (MEGCU). O alfa de Cronbach atinge 0,95 e a análise factorial exploratória mostra os processos particulares de criação, transferência/armazenamento e aplicação/utilização do conhecimento como variáveis latentes que explicam as atividades realizadas pelo grupo da UCE.Métricas do artigo
Resumo: 550 PDF (Español (España)): 245Métricas PlumX
Referências
Abbas, A., Avdic, A., Xiaobao, P., Hasan, M., & Ming, W. (2019). University-government collaboration for the generation and commercialization of new knowledge for use in industry. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4 (1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2018.03.002
Askary, S.; Qayyum, N. & Van Sant, R. (2015). Culture, communication skills and intellectual capital: a theoretical framework. International Journal of Higher Education and Sustainability, 1 (1), 88–101.
Alimohammadlou, M., & Eslamloo, F. (2016). Relationship between Total Quality Management, Knowledge Transfer and Knowledge Diffusion in the Academic Settings. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230, 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.09.013
Azagra-Caro, J., Barberá-Tomás, D., Edwards-Schachter, M., & Tur, E. (2017). Dynamic interactions between university-industry knowledge transfer channels: A case study of the most highly cited academic patent. Research Policy, 46 (2), 463–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.011
Baglieri, D., Baldi, F., & Tucci, C. (2018). University technology transfer office business models: One size does not fit all. Technovation, 76–77, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.003
Barley, W., Treem, J., & Kuhn, T. (2018). Valuing Multiple Trajectories of Knowledge: A Critical Review and Agenda for Knowledge Management Research. Academy of Management Annals, 12 (1), 278–317. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0041
Bejinaru, R. (2017a). Dynamic Capabilities of Universities in the Knowledge Economy. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 5 (4), 577–595. https://doi.org/10.25019/MDKE/5.4.07
Bejinaru, R. (2017b). Knowledge strategies aiming to improve the intellectual capital of universities. Management & Marketing, 12 (3), 500–523. https://doi.org/10.1515/mmcks-2017-0030
Bejinaru, R. (2018). The key processes of knowledge dynamics and intellectual capital in organizations. In C. Brătianu, A. Zbuchea, & A. Vițelar (Eds.), Strategica 2018. Challenging the Status Quo in Management and Economics (pp. 599–609). Bucharest: Faculty of Management (SNSPA).
Blind, Knut, Pohlisch, J., & Zi, A. (2018). Publishing, patenting, and standardization: Motives and barriers of scientists. Research Policy, 47 (7), 1185–1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.011
Blankenburg, K. (2018). Intellectual Capital in German Non-profit Organisations (First). In Contributions to Management Science (First). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62655-0
Bratianu, C. (2018a). A holistic view of the organizational knowledge dynamics. Holistica – Journal of Business and Public Administration, 9 (2), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.2478/hjbpa-2018-0009
Bratianu, C. (2018b). Universities as learning organizations: challenges and strategies. In C. Brătianu, A. Zbuchea, & A. Vițelar (Eds.), Strategica 2018. Challenging the Status Quo in Management and Economics (pp. 545–554). Bucharest: Faculty of Management (SNSPA).
Cordero, D. (2016). Modelo para Gobierno de Tecnologías de la Información (GTI): caso de las Universidades Cofinanciadas de la Zona 6 de la República del Ecuador. Tesis doctoral, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, pp. 315.
Creswell, J. (2014). Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. California: Sage Publications.
Crescenzi, R., Nathan, M., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2016). Do inventors talk to strangers? On proximity and collaborative knowledge creation. Research Policy, 45 (1), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.003
Cricelli, L., Greco, M., Grimaldi, M., & Llanes Dueñas, L. (2018). Intellectual capital and university performance in emerging countries. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19 (1), 71–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-02-2017-0037
Cuadrado, G. y Carrillo, P. (2016). Los procesos de gestión del conocimiento. El caso de las universidades del Ecuador. En: Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán (Ed.), XX Congreso internacional de investigación en ciencias administrativas (ACACIA) (p. 30). Merida, Yucatán: Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán.
Cuadrado, G. (2017). Modelo para la evaluación de la gestión del conocimiento de la universidad: el caso de la universidad cofinanciada del Ecuador. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).
Demuner, M.; Nava, R. & Ibarra, M. (2016). Dimensiones e indicadores de capital estructural para la universidad pública. In M. Nava, Rosa; Mercado, Patricia; Demuner (Ed.), El capital intelectual en la universidad pública (1st ed., pp. 61–80). Ciudad de México: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México.
De Silva, M., & Rossi, F. (2018). The effect of firms’ relational capabilities on knowledge acquisition and co-creation with universities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 133, 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.004
Ecuador. Presidencia de la República. Ley Orgánica de Educación Superior (LOES) (2018) Quito.
Elezi, E., & Bamber, C. (2018). Knowledge management in the uk higher education institutions: what type of outcomes do higher education partnerships attain? In C. Brătianu, A. Zbuchea, & A. Vițelar (Eds.), Strategica 2018. Challenging the Status Quo in Management and Economics (pp. 573–586). Bucharest: Faculty of Management (SNSPA).
Etzkowitz, H. (2017). Innovation Lodestar: The entrepreneurial university in a stellar knowledge firmament. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.026
Ferreira, J., Mueller, J., & Papa, A. (2018). Strategic knowledge management: theory, practice and future challenges. Journal of Knowledge Management, JKM-07-2018-0461. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2018-0461
Frondizi, R., Fantauzzi, C., Colasanti, N., & Fiorani, G. (2019). The Evaluation of Universities’ Third Mission and Intellectual Capital: Theoretical Analysis and Application to Italy. Sustainability, 11 (12), 3455. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123455
Galego-Álvarez, I., Formigoni, H., y Antunes, M. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility Practices at Brazilian Firms. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 54 (1), 12–27.
García-Berro, E., Roca, S., Navallas, F., Soriano, M., y Ras, A. (2016). El impacto de las políticas de evaluación del profesorado en la posición en los ránquines universitarios: el caso de la Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña. Aula Abierta, 44 (1), 23–30.
Govender, L., Perumal, R, & Perumal, S. (2018). Knowledge management as a strategic tool for human resource management at higher education institutions. SA Journal of Information Management, 20 (1). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v20i1.966
Gupta, P., Mehrotra, D., y Sharma, T. (2015). Identifying Knowledge Indicators in Higher Education Organization. Procedia Computer Science, 46, 449–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.02.043
Henríquez, P. (2018). El papel estratégico de la educación superior en el desarrollo sostenible de América Latina y el Caribe. In H. Henríquez, Pedro; Juri (Ed.), Tendencias de la educación superior en América Latina y el Caribe 2018 (Primera, pp. 275–308). Córdoba, Argentina: UNESCO–IESALC.
Lara, F. (2017). Las Ciencias de la Complejidad en la Solución de Nuestros Problemas Sociales. In Aplicaciones de las ciencias de la complejidad al diagnóstico e intervención en problemas sociales (pp. 1–41). Ciudad de México: Ediciones Académicas de Pedagogía Colofon.
Leih, S., & Teece, D. (2016). Campus Leadership and the Entrepreneurial University: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30 (2), 182–210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0022
Mahdi, O., Nassar, I., & Almsafir, M. (2019). Knowledge management processes and sustainable competitive advantage: An empirical examination in private universities. Journal of Business Research, 94, 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.013
Mansor, Z., Mustaffa, M. & Salleh, L. (2015). Motivation and Willingness to Participate in Knowledge Sharing Activities Among Academics in a Public University. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01188-0
Marchiori, D., & Franco, M. (2019). Knowledge transfer in the context of inter-organizational networks: Foundations and intellectual structures. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.02.001
Medland, E. (2016). Assessment in higher education: drivers, barriers and directions for change in the UK. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41 (1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.982072
Mercado, P.; García, P. & Cernas, D. (2016a). El capital intelectual en la gestión de la universidad pública: un medio para sus fines. In M. Nava, Rosa; Mercado, Patricia; Demuner (Ed.), El capital intelectual en la universidad pública (1st ed., pp. 19–40). Ciudad de México: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México.
Mercado, P., Gil-Monte, P., & Cernas, D. (2016b). Validez Inicial de una Escala de Medición del Capital Intelectual en Universidades. Universitas Psychologica, 15 (2), 109. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-2.viem
Miake, A., Carvalho, R., Pinto, M., & Graeml, A. (2018). Customer Knowledge Management (CKM): Model Proposal and Evaluation in a Large Brazilian Higher Education Private Group. Brazilian Business Review, 15 (2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2018.15.2.3
Mochales, G. (2014). Modelo explicativo de la responsabilidad social corporativa estratégica. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, pp. 335.
Muscio, A., & Ramaciotti, L. (2019). How does academia influence Ph.D. entrepreneurship? New insights on the entrepreneurial university. Technovation, 82–83, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.02.003
Nava, R.; Cernas, D.; Jiménez, P. (2016). Modelo de medición de capital relacional para la universidad pública. In M. Nava, Rosa; Mercado, Patricia; Demuner (Ed.), El capital intelectual en la universidad pública (1ª. ed., pp. 81–100). Ciudad de México: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México.
Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press.
Olcay, G., & Bulu, M. (2017). Is measuring the knowledge creation of universities possible?: A review of university rankings. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.029
Ostrom, E. (2015). Comprender la diversidad institucional. México, D. F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
Petrova, G., Smokotin, V., Kornienko, A., Ershova, I. A., & Kachalov, N. A. (2015). Knowledge Management as a Strategy for the Administration of Education in the Research University. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 451–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.552
Ramírez, Luis (2016). La evaluación de la educación superior: Un campo de tensiones. Fides Et Ratio, 11 (11), 125–138.
Ramírez-Córcoles, Y., & Manzaneque-Lizano, M. (2015). The relevance of intellectual capital disclosure: empirical evidence from Spanish universities. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13 (1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.27
Ramírez-Córcoles, Y.; Manzaneque-Lizano, M., & Priego, A. (2017). Formulating and elaborating a model for the measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish public universities. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83 (1), 149–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315575168
Rinesi, E. (2018). Universidad y desarrollo (Notas sobre la cuestión del “derecho a la Universidad”). In L. Petersen (Ed.), Balances y desafíos hacia la CRES 2018. Cuaderno 1. Aportes para pensar la Universidad Latinoamericana (1ª. ed., pp. 61–72). Buenos Aires: Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO).
Sadeghi B., S., Hasani, K., & Delshab, V. (2019). Investigating the influence of knowledge management on organizational innovation in higher educational institutions. Kybernetes, K-09-2018-0492. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-09-2018-0492
Secundo, Giustina, Elena-Pérez, S., Martinaitis, Ž., & Leitner, K. (2017). An Intellectual Capital framework to measure universities’ third mission activities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.013
Santos De Souza, B. (2015). La universidad en el Siglo XXI (1ª ed.). México, D. F.: Siglo XXI Editores.
Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2016). Negotiate, reciprocate, or cooperate? The impact of exchange modes on inter-employee knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20 (4), 687–712. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2015-0394
Serenko, A. (2019). Looking Beyond the Pointing Finger: Ensuring the Success of the Scholarly Capital Model in the Contemporary Academic Environment. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04413
Sengupta, A., & Ray, A. (2017). University research and knowledge transfer: A dynamic view of ambidexterity in british universities. Research Policy, 46 (5), 881–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.008
Streck, D. (2018). La universidad como lugar de posibilidades. In L. K. Suasnábar, C.; Del Valle, D. & Didriksson, A. (Ed.), Balances y desafíos hacia la CRES 2018 (1ª. ed., pp. 131 – 137). Buenos Aires: Instituto de Estudios y Capacitación de la Federación Nacional de Docentes Universitarios (IEC-CONADU), Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO), Universidad Nacional de las Artes (UNA).
Schaik, P. van, Volman, M., Admiraal, W. & Schenke, W. (2018). Barriers and conditions for teachers’ utilisation of academic knowledge. International Journal of Educational Research, 90, 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.05.003
Zharova, A. (2018). Measures of University Research Output. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2020 Gabriela Cuadrado Barreto
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
