Identification of critical productive and environmental parameters in industrial commercial pig farms: A qualitative approach from Antioquia, Colombia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33571/rpolitec.v22n43a8

Keywords:

zootechnical parameters, environmental monitoring, IoT, animal welfare, Antioquia

Abstract

Objective: To identify the critical productive, environmental, health, and welfare parameters in swine farms of the Industrial Commercial category in Antioquia, Colombia, as an input for the design of a technological package based on the Internet of Things (IoT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI).

Methodology: A mixed-methods approach with a non-experimental observational design, complemented by elements of Participatory Action Research (PAR). In the qualitative phase, semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with participants experienced in commercial farms, which were analyzed using thematic coding [1].

Results: Forty-seven (47) parameters were prioritized and distributed into four categories: (1) zootechnical/productive: general indicators, reproductive phase, and fattening; (2) environmental: thermal variables, toxic gases, and environmental management; (3) health; and (4) animal welfare.

Conclusions: This study lays the methodological foundations for the development of an IoT-AI system that enables data-driven decision-making in industrial commercial farms in Antioquia.

Article Metrics

 Abstract: 45  PDF (Español (España)): 13 

PlumX metrics

Author Biographies

Oscar Hernan Velasquez-Arboleda, Politécnico Colombiano Jaime Isaza Cadavid

Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Grupo de Investigación GIBA

Ricardo Colmenares-Flórez, Politécnico Colombiano Jaime Isaza Cadavid

Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Grupo de Investigación GIBA

Janeth Areiza-Gómez, Politécnico Colombiano Jaime Isaza Cadavid

Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Grupo de Investigación GIBA

José Daniel Aguirre-Hoyos, Politécnico Colombiano Jaime Isaza Cadavid

Facultad de Ingenierías, Semillero Ícaro

References

[1] PorkColombia & Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario. (2025). Estadísticas del sector porcícola colombiano 2024–2025. PorkColombia. https://www.porkcolombia.co

[2] Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario. (2025). Censos pecuarios nacionales 2024–2025. ICA. https://www.ica.gov.co

[3] Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario. (2020). Resolución No. 076509 de 2020: Por medio de la cual se establecen los requisitos para obtener la certificación de las granjas porcícolas en buenas prácticas ganaderas. ICA. https://www.ica.gov.co

[4] Colmenares-Flórez, R., Restrepo-Vélez, C., Areiza-Gómez, J., Velásquez-Arboleda, O. H., Mejía-Castrillón, J. C., & Correa-Torres, C. M. (2025). Informe de investigación Diseño de un paquete tecnológico validado basado en IoT e IA para la medición de parámetros productivos y ambientales en granjas comerciales industriales porcícolas [Documento de proyecto FIN01]. Grupo GIBA, Politécnico Colombiano Jaime Isaza Cadavid.

[5] Rauw, W. M., Mayorga, E. J., Lei, S. M., Dekkers, J. C. M., Patience, J. F., Gabler, N. K., Lonergan, S. M., & Baumgard, L. H. (2020). Impact of environmental temperature on production traits in pigs. Scientific Reports, 10(1), Artículo 2721. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58981-w

[6] Buoio, E., Cialini, C., & Costa, A. (2023). Air quality assessment in pig farming: The Italian Classyfarm. Animals, 13(14), Artículo 2297. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13142297

[7] Wang, X., Wang, M., Chen, S., Zhang, Y., Liu, Q., Hu, L., & Zheng, T. (2020). Ammonia exposure causes lung injuries and disturbs pulmonary circadian clock gene network in a pig study. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 205, Artículo 111050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111050

[8] Lagua, E. B., Mun, H. S., Ampode, K. M. B., Chem, V., Kim, Y. H., & Yang, C. J. (2024). Minimum carbon dioxide is a key predictor of the respiratory health of pigs in climate-controlled housing systems. Porcine Health Management, 10, Artículo 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-024-00408-3

[9] Koketsu, Y., Tani, S., & Iida, R. (2020). Farm data analysis for lifetime performance components of sows and their predictors in breeding herds. Porcine Health Management, 6, Artículo 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-020-00163-1

[10] Gormley, A., Jang, K. B., Garavito-Duarte, Y., Deng, Z., & Kim, S. W. (2024). Impacts of maternal nutrition on sow performance and potential positive effects on piglet performance. Animals, 14(13), Artículo 1858. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14131858

[11] Guan, R., Wu, J., Wang, Y., Chen, X., Zhang, W., & Yang, Y. (2023). Comparative analysis of productive performance and fattening efficiency of commercial pigs in China for two consecutive years. Scientific Reports, 13, Artículo 8154. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35430-y

[12] Navales, R. A. S., Tokach, M. D., DeRouchey, J. M., Woodworth, J. C., Goodband, R. D., & Dritz, S. S. (2025). Technologies and practices to improve feed and nutrient utilization by pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 103, Artículo skaf043. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf043

[13] Sanz-Fernández, S., Rodríguez-Hernández, P., Díaz-Gaona, C., Tusell, L., Quintanilla, R., & Rodríguez-Estévez, V. (2024). Evolution of sow productivity and evaluation parameters: Spanish farms as a benchmark. Veterinary Sciences, 11(12), Artículo 626. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11120626

[14] Knol, E. F., & Neeteson-van Nieuwenhoven, A.-M. (2023). Genetic and phenotypic time trends of litter size, piglet mortality, and birth weight in pigs. Frontiers in Animal Science, 4, Artículo 1218175. https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2023.1218175

[15] Boonkum, W., Permthongchoochai, S., Chankitisakul, V., & Duangjinda, M. (2025). Genetic strategies for enhancing litter size and birth weight uniformity in piglets. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 12, Artículo 1512701. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1512701

[16] Will, K. J., Magalhães, E. S., Moura, C. A. A., Trevisan, G., Silva, G. S., Mellagi, A. P. G., Ulguim, R. R., Bortolozzo, F. P., & Linhares, D. C. L. (2024). Risk factors associated with piglet pre-weaning mortality in a Midwestern U.S. swine production system from 2020 to 2022. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 232, Artículo 106316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106316

[17] Paiva, R. C., Moura, C. A., Thomas, P., Haberl, B., Greiner, L., Rademacher, C. J., Silva, A. P. S. P., Trevisan, G., Linhares, D. C. L., & Silva, G. S. (2023). Risk factors associated with sow mortality in breeding herds under one production system in the Midwestern United States. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 213, Artículo 105883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.105883

[18] Gebhardt, J. T., Tokach, M. D., Dritz, S. S., DeRouchey, J. M., Woodworth, J. C., Goodband, R. D., & Henry, S. C. (2020). Postweaning mortality in commercial swine production. I: Review of non-infectious contributing factors. Translational Animal Science, 4(2), 462–484. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaa068

[19] Johnson, J. S., & Cecil, C. F. (2025). Heat stress matters: Insights from United States swine producers. Translational Animal Science, 9(1), Artículo txaf001. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaf001

[20] Hu, Z., Yang, Q., Tao, Y., Shi, L., Tu, J., & Wang, Y. (2023). A review of ventilation and cooling systems for large-scale pig farms. Sustainable Cities and Society, 89, Artículo 104372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104372

[21] Peng, S., Zhu, J., Liu, Z., Hu, B., Wang, M., & Pu, S. (2023). Prediction of ammonia concentration in a pig house based on machine learning models and environmental parameters. Animals, 13(1), Artículo 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13010165

[22] Parsiegel, R., Budag Becker, M., Gollnow, K., Freitag, C., Pöschel, K., & Hornig, G. (2025). Virtual MOS sensor array design for ammonia monitoring in pig barns. Sensors, 25(8), Artículo 2617. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25082617

[23] Park, J., Kang, T., Heo, Y., Lee, K., Kim, K., Lee, K., & Yoon, C. (2020). Evaluation of short-term exposure levels on ammonia and hydrogen sulfide during manure-handling processes at livestock farms. Safety and Health at Work, 11(1), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2019.12.007

[24] Pessoa, J., Camp Montoro, J., Pina Nunes, T., Norton, T., McAloon, C., Garcia Manzanilla, E., & Boyle, L. (2022). Environmental risk factors influence the frequency of coughing and sneezing episodes in finisher pigs on a farm free of respiratory disease. Animals, 12(8), Artículo 982. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12080982

[25] Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2016). Ley 1774 de 2016: Por medio de la cual se modifican el Código Civil, la Ley 84 de 1989, el Código Penal, el Código de Procedimiento Penal y se dictan otras disposiciones. Diario Oficial, (49747). https://www.secretariasenado.gov.co

[26] Stygar, A. H., Gómez, Y., Berteselli, G. V., Costa, E. D., Canali, E., Niemi, J. K., Llonch, P., & Pastell, M. (2021). A systematic review on validated precision livestock farming technologies for pig production and its potential to assess animal welfare. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8, Artículo 660565. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.660565

[27] Larsen, M. L. V., Wang, M., & Norton, T. (2021). Information technologies for welfare monitoring in pigs and their relation to Welfare Quality®. Sustainability, 13(2), Artículo 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020692

[28] Rubio Fuentes, M., Rubio Cifuentes, G. A., Ramírez Restrepo, S. A., & Arroyave Tobón, S. A. (2025). Implementation of an IoT-based livestock monitoring system using Mioty technology. Internet Technology Letters, 8(1), Artículo e70141. https://doi.org/10.1002/itl2.70141

[29] Wang, S., Jiang, H., Qiao, Y., Jiang, S., Lin, H., & Sun, Q. (2022). The research progress of vision-based artificial intelligence in smart pig farming. Sensors, 22(17), Artículo 6541. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22176541

[30] Mateo-Fornes, M., Gimeno-Blanes, F. J., García-Sánchez, A. J., & García-Haro, J. (2025). IoT system for monitoring breeding sows in swine farms. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2025.3526358

[31] Akinyemi, B. E., Vigors, B., Turner, S. P., Roehe, R., D’Eath, R. B., & Lawrence, A. B. (2023). Precision livestock farming: A qualitative exploration of swine industry stakeholders. Frontiers in Animal Science, 4, Artículo 1150528. https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2023.1150528

[32] Ritter, C., Koralesky, K. E., Saraceni, J., Roche, S., Vaarst, M., & Kelton, D. (2023). Invited review: Qualitative research in dairy science—A narrative review. Journal of Dairy Science, 106(9), 5880–5895. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-23125

[33] Ministerio de Salud de Colombia. (1993). Resolución 8430 de 1993: Por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud. Ministerio de Salud. https://www.minsalud.gov.co

[34] Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2012). Ley 1581 de 2012: Por la cual se dictan disposiciones generales para la protección de datos personales. Diario Oficial, (48587). https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co

[35] Consejo de la Unión Europea. (2009). Directiva 2008/120/CE del Consejo, de 18 de diciembre de 2008, relativa a las normas mínimas para la protección de cerdos. Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea, L 47, 5–13. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32008L0120

[36] Chidgey, K. L. (2024). Review: Space allowance for growing pigs: Animal welfare, performance and on-farm practicality. Animal, 18(Supl. 1), Artículo 100890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.100890

[37] Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (s.f.). Carbon monoxide. U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/carbon-monoxide

[38] Vaarst, M., Ritter, C., Saraceni, J., Roche, S., Koralesky, K. E., & Kelton, D. F. (2024). Invited review: Qualitative social and human science research focusing on actors in and around dairy farming. Journal of Dairy Science, 107(12), 10050–10065. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25329

Published

2026-06-16

How to Cite

Velasquez-Arboleda, O. H., Colmenares-Flórez, R., Areiza-Gómez, J., & Aguirre-Hoyos, J. D. (2026). Identification of critical productive and environmental parameters in industrial commercial pig farms: A qualitative approach from Antioquia, Colombia. Revista Politécnica, 22(43), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.33571/rpolitec.v22n43a8