Curriculist god- a documentary analysis on the idea of body, formation and man, in the curriculum of physical education in basic primary in religious i. E.
Keywords:
body, curriculum, man, formationAbstract
Physical Education curriculum throughout history have been accompanied by different political, economic, social and religious positions, this has led to the fact that, currently, and based on the evaluation exams that are carried out annually (such as the ICFES tests), private and religious educational institutions are the ones that postulate the type of man, body and training that they consider best. In the same way, these educational institutions through their curricula show their different ideological positions, especially about the body. However, the main objective of this research is to interpret the idea of the body that exists in curriculum of the 45 best institutions (according to Sapiens Research), in the city of Medellín, this will be done through the conceptual framework of Pedraza, Z. (2010), Bollnow, O.F. (2005) and Da Silva, T.T. (2001). The methodology has a mixed approach, accompanied by a content analysis as a method and a documentary systematization as a technique. An important finding is that the body for these educational institutions is unilateral, that is, it is understood from the curriculum as a tool, temple or machine, in addition, the distinction between the sexes continues to exist when developing the curriculum in the area of education physical.
Article Metrics
Abstract: 143 PDF (Español (España)): 65References
Avendaño, F. (1988). Ser católico: principio de inserción y compromiso histórico. Revista Praxis, (22-21), 9-21.
Barriga, Á. D. (1997). Didáctica y currículum. Paidós.
Bollnow, O. F. (2005). Principios metódicos de la antropología pedagógica. Revista Educación y Pedagogía, 17(42), 77-80.
Da Silva, T. T. (2001). Dr. Nietzsche, curriculista, con aportes del profesor Deleuze: una mirada post-estructuralista de la teoría del currículum. Pensamiento Educativo, Revista de Investigación Latinoamericana (PEL), 29(2), 15-36. Dogliotti, P. (2012). Cuerpo y currículum: discursividades en torno a la formación de docentes de educación física en Uruguay (1874-1948).
de Bogotá, CDC (1994). Ley 115 de 1994.
Duverger, M. (1962). Métodos de investigación en las relaciones sociales. Rialp.
Enríquez, M. F. C. El análisis de la realidad social: Métodos y técnicas de investigación. García M., Alvira, F., Alonso, L. y Escobar, M. (comps.). Alianza, 2015. Revista Española de Sociología, 25(3).
Grundy, S. (1998). Producto o praxis del curriculum. Ediciones Morata.
Hostil O.R. (1969) Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Addison
Ortega, A. O. (2018). Enfoques de investigación. https://www. researchgate. net/profile/Alfredo_Otero_Ortega/publication/326905435_ENFOQUES_DE_INVESTIGACION_TABLA_DE_CONTENIDO_Contenido/links/5b6b7f9992851ca650526dfd/ENFOQUES-DE-INVESTIGACION-TABLA-DECONTENIDO-Contenido. pdf el, 14.
Pedraza, Z. (2010). Saber, cuerpo y escuela: el uso de los sentidos y la educación somática. Calle14: revista de investigación en el campo del arte, 4(5), 44-56.
Sánchez, M. L. Z. (2002). Corrientes y tendencias de la Educación Física (Vol. 571). Inde.
Stone, P.J. Dunphy D.C, Smith M.S. Ogilvie D. M. (Ed) (1966), The general inquirie
Troeltsch, E. (2021). El protestantismo y el mundo moderno. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrés Mora Pérez, Camila Andrea Jiménez Arteaga, María Cristina García, Andrés Felipe Correa Castaño
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.