En torno a la evolución de la investigación en Contabilidad Social y Medioambiental

Carlos Larrinaga González

Resumen


La intención de este documento es caracterizar la evolución de la investigación en contabilidad social y medioambiental, para ofrecer una visión de conjunto –sin ser sistemática ni exhaustiva– sobre este campo académico. Inicialmente se analiza la evolución de este campo de investigación a la luz de diferentes perspectivas teóricas, como el enfoque normativo, el marco conceptual y el paradigma de la utilidad para la toma de decisiones. Luego se exponen las teorías descriptivas aplicadas al reporte de información social y medioambiental de las empresas desde los enfoques de la teoría de los grupos de interés, la teoría de la legitimidad y la teoría institucional. El texto hace precisiones conceptuales que favorecen la comprensión de esta clasificación y advierte las posibilidades de otros enfoques más progresistas para guiar el estudio de la temática.

Texto completo:

PDF

Referencias


ADAMS, Carol A. (2004), “The ethical, social and environmental reportingperformance

portrayal gap”. En: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,

Vol. 17 N°15. Bingley (UK): MCB University Press. Pp. 731-757.

• ANTHEAUME, Nicolás. (2004), “Valuing external costs. From theory to practice:

implications for full cost environmental accounting”. En: European Accounting

Review, Vol. 13 N° 3. Abingdon (UK): Taylor & Francis. Pp. 443-464.

• BALL, Ray y BROWN, Philip. (1968). “An Empirical Evaluation of Accounting

Income Numbers”. En: Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 6 N° 2. Chicago: The

Accounting Research Center- University of Chicago. Pp. 159-178.

• BEBBINGTON, Jan y GRAY, Robert (2001), “An Account of Sustainability: Failure,

Success and a Reconceptualization”. En: Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol.

N° 5. Cambridge: Academic Press. Pp. 557-588.

• BEBBINGTON, Jan y LARRINAGA, Carlos (2014), “Accounting and sustainable

development: An exploration”: En: Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol.

N° 6. Oxford (UK): Pergamon Press. Pp. 395-413.

• BEBBINGTON, Jan, LARRINAGA, Carlos y MONEVA, José María (2008), “Corporate

social reporting and reputation risk management”. En: Accounting, Auditing &

Accountability Journal, Vol. 21 N° 3. Bingley (UK): MCB University Press. Pp. 337-

• BERGER, Peter y LUCKMANN, Thomas. (1966), The social construction of reality.

Buenos Aires: Amorrortu Editores.

• BOIRAL, Oliver. (2013), “Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of

A and A+ GRI reports”. En: Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol.

N° 7. Bingley (UK): MCB University Press. Pp. 1036-1071.

• CORMIER, Denis, MAGNAN, Michel y MORARD, Bernard. (1993), “The impact

of corporate pollution on market valuation: some empirical evidence”. En:

Carlos Larrinaga González

Teuken Bidikay Vol. 8 Nº 11 (Medellín, Colombia) v Julio - Diciembre 2017. ISSN 2215-8405. Pp. 21-38

• DEEGAN, Craig y BLOMQUIST, Christopher. (2006), “Stakeholder influence on

corporate reporting: An exploration of the interaction between WWF-Australia

and the Australian minerals industry”. En: Accounting, Organizations and Society,

Vol. 31 N° 4-5. Oxford (UK): Pergamon Press. Pp. 343-372.

• DEEGAN, Craig y RANKIN, Michaela. (1996), “Do Australian companies report

environmental news objectively? An analysis of environmental disclosures by

firms prosecuted successfully by the Environmental Protection Authority”. En:

Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 9 N° 2. Bingley (UK): MCB

University Press. Pp. 50-67.

• DEEGAN, Craig y UNERMAN, Jeffrey. (2011), Financial Accounting Theory. Londres:

McGraw-Hill.

• DIMAGGIO, Paul J. y POWELL, Walter W. (1983), “The iron cage revisited -

institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”.

En: American Sociological Review, Vol. 48 N° 2. Washington, D.C.: American

Sociological Association. Pp. 147-160.

• EHNERT, Ina, PARSA, Sepideh, ROPER, Ian, WAGNER, Marcus y MULLER-CAMEN,

Michael. (2016), “Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study

of sustainability reporting practices by the world’s largest companies”. En: The

International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 27 N° 1. Abingdon

(UK): Taylor & Francis. Pp. 88-108.

• ESTES, Ralph W. (1972), “Socio-Economic Accounting and External Diseconomies”.

En: The Accounting Review, Vol. 47 N° 2. Lakewood Ranch (USA): American

Accounting Association. Pp. 284-290.

• FEE. (2000), “Towards a General Accounting Framework for Environmental

Reporting”. Brussels: Féderation des Experts Comptables Européens.

• FREEDMAN, Martin y STAGLIANO, A. J. (1991), “Differences in Social‐Cost

Disclosures: A Market Test of Investor Reactions”. En: Accounting, Auditing &

Accountability Journal, Vol. 4 N° 1. Bingley (UK): MCB University Press. Pp. 294-

• FREEMAN, Edward. (2010), Strategic management: A stakeholder approach.

Cambridge: (UK): Cambridge University Press.

• GÓMEZ-VILLEGAS, Mauricio. y OSPINA-ZAPATA, Carlos Mario (2009), Avances

Interdisciplinarios para una Comprensión Crítica de la Contabilidad. Textos

Paradigmáticos de las Corrientes Heterodoxas. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de

Colombia.

• GRAY, Rob. (1992), “Accounting and environmentalism: An exploration of

the challenge of gently accounting for accountability, transparency and

sustainability”. En: Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 17 N° 5. Oxford

(UK): Pergamon Press. Pp. 399-425.

• GRAY, Rob. (2002), “The social accounting project and Accounting Organizations

and Society Privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and

pragmatism over critique?”. En: Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 27 N°

Oxford (UK): Pergamon Press. Pp. 687-708.

• GRAY, Rob. (2006), “Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and

organisational value creation?: Whose value? Whose creation?”. En: Accounting,

Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 19 N° 6. Bingley (UK): MCB University

Press. Pp. 793-819

• GRAY, Rob. (2010), “Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for

sustainability.and how would we know?. En: An exploration of narratives of

En torno a la evolución de la investigación en Contabilidad Social y Medioambiental 37

Teuken Bidikay Vol. 8 Nº 11 (Medellín, Colombia) v Julio - Diciembre 2017. ISSN 2215-8405. Pp. 21-38

organisations and the planet”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 35 N°

Oxford: Pergamon Press . Pp. 47-62.

• GRAY, Rob., OWEN, Dave. y MAUNDERS, Keith. (1987), Corporate social reporting:

accountaing and accountability. Londres: Prentice-Hall International.

• GRAY, Rob., OWEN, Dave and ADAMS, Carol A. (1996), Accounting and

accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental

reporting. Londres: Prentice Hall, London.

• GRI. (2016), “GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards 2016”. Amsterdam: Global

Reporting Initiative.

• HAHN, Rüdiger y KÜHNEN, Michael. (2013), “Determinants of sustainability

reporting: a review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding

field of research”. En: Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 59 N° 0. Amsterdam:

Elsevier. Pp. 5-21.

• HIGGINS, Colin y LARRINAGA, Carlos. (2014), “Sustainability reporting: insights

from neo-institutional theory”. En: Unerman, J., O’Dwyer, B. y Bebbington, J. (Eds.),

Sustainability accounting and accountability, 2a. ed. Oxford (UK): RoutledgeOxon.

• HOFFMAN, Andrew J. (1999), “Institutional evolution and change:

Environmentalism and the US chemical industry”. En: Academy of Management

Journal, Vol. 42 N° 4. Nueva York: Academy of Management-AOM. Pp. 351-371.

• ISLAM, Muhammad Azizul y DEEGAN, Craig. (2008), “Motivations for an organisation

within a developing country to report social responsibility information: Evidence

from Bangladesh”. En: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 21 N° 6.

Bingley (UK): MCB University Press. Pp. 850-874.

• JUNIOR, Renzo Mori, BEST, Peter J. y COTTER, Julie. (2014), “Sustainability

Reporting and Assurance: A Historical Analysis on a World-Wide Phenomenon”.

En: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 120 N° 1. Berlín: Springer. Pp. 1-11.

• KPMG. (2017), “KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017 “. En:

KPMG: www.kpmg.com/sustainability.

• LARRINAGA, Carlos. (1999), “Perspectivas alternativas de investigación en

contabilidad: Una revisión”. En: Revista de Contabilidad, Vol. 2 N° 3. Madrid:

ASEPUC. Pp. 103-132.

• LINDBLOM, Cristi K. (1994), “The implications of organizational legitimacy

for corporate social performance and disclosure”. En: Critical Perspectives on

Accounting Conference, New York.

• MEYER, John W. y ROWAN, Brian. (1977), “Institutionalized organizations - formalstructure

as myth and ceremony”. En: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 83 N° 2.

Chicago: Universidad de Chicago. Pp. 340-363.

• MITCHELL, Ronald K., AGLE, Bradley R. y WOOD, Donna J. (1997), “Toward a

Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who

and What Really Counts”. En: The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22 N° 4.

Nueva York: Academy of Management-AOM. Pp. 853-886.

• MONTERREY-MAYORAL, Juan. (1998), “Un recorrido por la contabilidad positiva”.

En: Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, Vol. 27 N° 95. Madrid:

Asociación Española de Contabilidad y Adminsitración de Empresas-AECA. Pp.

-467.

Carlos Larrinaga González

Teuken Bidikay Vol. 8 Nº 11 (Medellín, Colombia) v Julio - Diciembre 2017. ISSN 2215-8405. Pp. 21-38

• NEU, Dean, WARSAME, Alí Haji y PEDWELL, Katie. (1998), “Managing public

impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports”. En: Accounting,

Organizations and Society, Vol. 23 N° 3. Oxford (UK): Pergamon Press. Pp. 265-282.

• O’DWYER, Brendan y UNERMAN, Jeffrey. (2007), “From functional to social

accountability: Transforming the accountability relationship between funders

and non-governmental development organisations”. En: Accounting, Auditing &

Accountability Journal, Vol. 20 N° 3. Bingley (UK): MCB University Press. Pp. 446-

• O’DWYER, Brendan. (2003), “Conceptions of corporate social responsibility: the

nature of managerial capture”. En: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,

Vol. 16 N° 4. Bingley (UK): MCB University Press. Pp. 523-557.

• OLIVER, Christine. (1991), “Strategic responses to institutional processes”.

En: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16 N° 1. Nueva York: Academy of

Management-AOM. Pp. 145-179.

• PATTEN, Dennis M. (1992), “Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response

to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory”. En: Accounting, Organizations

and Society, Vol. 17 N° 5. Oxford (UK): Pergamon Press. Pp. 471-475.

• PINA-MARTÍNEZ, Vicente. (1991), “Investigacion empirica y normalizacion

contable”. En: Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, Vol. 20 N° 66.

Madrid: Asociación Española de Contabilidad y Adminsitración de EmpresasAECA.

Pp. 83-126.

• RAMANATHAN, Kavasseri V. (1976), “Toward a Theory of Corporate Social

Accounting”. En: The Accounting Review, Vol. 51 N° 3. Lakewood Ranch (USA):

American Accounting Association. Pp. 516-528.

• RIAHI-BELKAOUI, Ahmed. (2004), Accounting theory. Londres: Academic Press.

• SCOTT, W. Richard. (2008). Institutions and organizations. Newcastle (UK): Sage.

• SINKOVICS, Noemi, HOQUE, Samia Ferdous and SINKOVICS, Rudolf R. (2016), “Rana

Plaza collapse aftermath: are CSR compliance and auditing pressures effective?”.

En: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 29 N° 4. Bingley (UK): MCB

University Press. Pp. 617-649.

• SPICER, Barry H. (1978), “Investors, Corporate Social Performance and Information

Disclosure: An Empirical Study”. En: The Accounting Review, Vol. 53 N° 1. Lakewood

Ranch (USA): American Accounting Association. Pp. 94-111.

• SUCHMAN, Mark C. (1995), “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional

Approaches”. En: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 N° 3. Nueva York:

Academy of Management-AOM. Pp. 571-610.

• TROTMAN, Ken T. y BRADLEY, Graham W. (1981), “Associations between social

responsibility disclosure and characteristics of companies”. En: Accounting,

Organizations and Society, Vol. 6 N° 4. Oxford (UK): Pergamon Press. Pp. 355-362.

• ULLMANN, Arieh A. (1985), “Data in search of a theory - a critical-examination

of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economicperformance

of United-States firms” En: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 10

N° 3. Nueva York: Academy of Management-AOM. Pp. 540-557.


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.